home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: midway.evtech.com!travis
- From: travis@evtech.com (Travis Hassloch x231)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Please Explain Octets
- Date: 25 Mar 1996 22:27:55 GMT
- Organization: Evolutionary Technologies, Inc.
- Message-ID: <4j76lb$hp6@midway.evtech.com>
- References: <4ii0aa$n8f@news-e2b.gnn.com> <DoGopu.FE7@freenet.carleton.ca> <4im0ej$1dcc@hopi.gate.net> <4iqh6r$scn@bristlecone.together.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tahiti.evtech.com
-
- In article <4iqh6r$scn@bristlecone.together.net>, <krw@together.net> wrote:
- > Great! Another BAUDS (sic) vs BPS confusion coming. An Octet is also
- > the size of a DES encryption block. Since the Inet is about (any
- > year now) to go secure, this will certainly help the cause of
- > understanding.
-
- bzzt, if DES uses this, it is using it incorrectly.
- DES operates on 56 input bits, ignoring parity bits. The input is usually
- represented as 64 bits == 8 octets. I have never heard it called a
- single octet.
-
- Octet was defined by the IETF, and is used with respect to IP addressing.
- There is no confusion when you use this term; it is 8 bits. period. :)
-
- Plus, many OSes are going with Unicode or other >8bit chars, so expect
- to see 16-bit bytes.
- It is interesting to note many people have been predicting the death
- of the 8-bit byte for a long time now.
- --
- travis@evtech.com | I don't speak for ETI. | P=NP if (N=1 or P=0)
- WARNING: Unsolicited commercial e-mail: $500 per message
- US Code, Title 47 Section 227 (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/227.html)
- This message may not be redistributed on the Microsoft Network.
-